Skip to content

Knowledge Synthesis · For decision-makers

Literature Review

What a literature review from Fuse looks like: how it is organized, what its pages read like, and what you receive at the end.

1 · The structure

How the document is organized

The sections of a typical literature review, with their usual length. Each project adapts them to its question and its readers.

  1. Summary and key messagesA two-page summary of the main findings.
    ~2 p.
  2. The question and the scopeWhat decision the review serves, and what it leaves out.
    ~2 p.
  3. Where we searchedDatabases, reports and grey literature, and the criteria for keeping a source.
    ~2 p.
  4. Findings, theme by themeOrganized by theme rather than as a list of summaries.
    ~18 p.
  5. Knowledge gapsWhat the evidence does not yet answer.
    ~2 p.
  6. Management implicationsWhat the findings mean for the decision.
    ~3 p.
  7. Summary table of sourcesEvery study, its region, method and main finding.
    ~4 p.
2 · Extracts

What the pages look like

Sample page layouts: mock-ups, not extracts from a completed project. The grey lines stand for text.

Key messages

Key messages

Summary table of sources

SourceRegionMethodMain finding
Summary table of sources

Management implications

For the decisionFor monitoring
Management implications
3 · The final product

What you receive

Read the full report PDFPDF coming soon

Literature ReviewExample coming soon

Need a literature review?

Tell us the decision it has to serve.